Legal Opinion

Kraytsberg v. Kaplan

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided August 2, 2010Published

1Opinion of the CourtO’Shea, J.

Plaintiffs Yuri Kraytsberg (“Kraytsberg”) and Renata Kuchinsky (“Kuchinsky”) filed this suit, pro se, against defendant Richard Kaplan (“Kaplan”) for personal injuries and property damage arising out of a motor vehicle accident on December 10, 2005. The suit was commenced on December 9, 2008, one day shy of the three-year statute of limitations. On March 23,2009, Kaplan filed a Mass. R. Civ. E, Rule 12(b) (6), motion to dismiss the personal injury portion of the plaintiffs’ complaint for failure to satisfy the so-called tort threshold for damages. G.L.c. 231, §6D. The motion was allowed, and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Davis v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  2. Cullen Enterprises, Inc. v. Massachusetts Property Insurance Underwriting Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  3. Twin Fires Investment, LLC v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  4. Gath v. M/A-Com, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  5. Greenleaf v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API