Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Horvath v. State Teachers Retirement Bd.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 19, 1998No. 1997-1197PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 83 Ohio St.3d 67.] THE STATE EX REL. HORVATH, APPELLANT, v. STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT BOARD, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Horvath v. State Teachers Retirement Bd.,

1998-Ohio-424.] Teachers—State Teachers Retirement System—Nature and extent of a contributor’s protected property rights in the STRS are determined solely by the statutes that govern the system—Public school teachers possess contract rights in any STRS benefit, when. 1. Mandatory teacher contributions to the State Teachers Retirement System result from economic…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cosby v. CosbyOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. City of Lima v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Shelly Materials v. Clark Cty. Bd., Unpublished Decision (12-12-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Clifton v. Village of Blanchester, Ca2007-09-040 (9-2-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Sherman v. Ohio Pub. Emps. Retirement Sys.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API