Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Horvath v. State Teachers Retirement Board
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided August 19, 1998No. 97-1197PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCook, J.
For the reasons stated below, we reject Horvath’s challenges to R.C. 3307.651 and determine that he is not entitled to post-1959 interest on his wife’s contributions.
• I. R.C. 3307.651(3)
From the inception of this action, Horvath’s arguments have lumped together R.C. 3307.651(2) and 3307.651(3) and referred to them collectively as the “no interest” statute. In this appeal, Horvath continues to assert that we should invalidate both statutory divisions. Scrutiny of Horvath’s claims, however, reveals that only R.C. 3307.651(2) is truly at issue in this case.
R.C. 3307.651(2) delays crediting of…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Westfield Insurance v. GalatisOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- City of East Liverpool v. Columbiana County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Cosby v. CosbyOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Board of Trustees of The Tobacco Use Prevention & Control Foundation v. BoyceOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
- Buzzard v. Public Employees Retirement SystemOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.