Legal Opinion

Fuller v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1968No. 751PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before NESBETT, C. J., and DIMOND and RABINOWITZ, JJ. DIMOND, Justice.

A jury found appellant guilty of the crime of shooting with intent to kill or wound. He has appealed, claiming that the judgment of conviction should be reversed because certain evidence was erroneously admitted and because of the insufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict.

A man named Lester James Brown, also known as Tony Dutra, was the person charged with the actual shooting.1 The state’s theory of appellant’s guilt was that he had hired Brown to do the shooting.

Over appellant’s objection the state…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Ford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Schwartz v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Benanti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. DuPont v. Crummer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Beckley v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Roberts v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Resolute Insurance Co. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
  4. United States ex rel. Rosner v. WardenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
  5. Beckley v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API