Cassidy v. Souster
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in tile district court for Kamsey county to determine adverse claims to a certain vacant city lot. Defendant Souster was personally served but. did not appear or answer. Defendant Brodie claimed a lien by virtue of certain local improvement certificates of sale.
Read the full summary
Action in tile district court for Kamsey county to determine adverse claims to a certain vacant city lot. Defendant Souster was personally served but. did not appear or answer. Defendant Brodie claimed a lien by virtue of certain local improvement certificates of sale. The case was tried before Kelly, J., who made. findings of fact and as conclusion of law found that plaintiff was entitled to judgment and that he was the owner in fee simple of all the land, subject to a lien on so much thereof as was covered by local improvement certificate of sale numbered B 1,473, owned and held by…
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Local improvement proceedings were duly commenced under and pursuant to provisions of the charter of the city of St. Paul for the grading and improvement of a certain street therein, namely Fair-view street, between Fifteenth street and Pennsylvania avenue, culminating, on March 28, 1891, in a judgment of the district court of Bamsey county confirming an assessment of benefited property and directing a sale thereof if the assessments were not paid. A certified copy of the judgment and order was duly transmitted to the city treasurer, as required by the city charter, and that official duly…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mulvey v. TozerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Bennett v. BlatzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Kipp v. CollinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lindahl v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- State v. Minnesota & Ontario Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Hartkopf v. First State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Hartkopf v. First State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934