Legal Opinion
Lindahl v. State
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 13, 1955No. 36,447PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Matson, Justice.
In an action under the provisions of M. S. A. c. 278 for the review of the validity of an assessment of real estate against his property, petitioner appeals from a judgment in favor of the state.
Petitioner owns a lot and house in Pheasant Lawn Addition, Orono township, Hennepin county, Minnesota. As of May 1, 1952, the local assessor assessed this property at a total true and full value of $9,000. On August 18, 1952, the county board of equaliza*508tion adopted a resolution increasing the assessed valuation on real property within said township and county; as a result,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- County of Redwood v. Winona & St. Peter Land Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- State v. Lakeside Land Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- State v. BollenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Moss v. CummingsMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Wegener v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- In RE PETITION OF HAMM v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- CAROGA REALTY COMPANY v. TapperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Chun King Sales, Inc. v. County of St. LouisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Real Estate Tax Assessments of Real Property of Silver Lake Apartments, Inc. v. County of OlmstedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.