Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hartkopf v. First State Bank

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 25, 1934No. 29,842Published

1DissentJulius J. Olson, Justice

A notary public is a public officer, and, as such, speaking generally, it is his duty “to attest the genuineness of any deeds or writings in order to render them available as evidence of the facts therein contained.” 20 R. C. L. p. 326, § 2, and cases under notes 4 and 7.

This court in Wood v. St. Paul City Ry. Co. 42 Minn. 411, 413, 44 N. W. 308, 7 L. R. A. 149, said:

“A notary public is considered not merely an officer of the country where he is admitted or appointed, but as a kind of international officer, whose official acts, performed in the state for which he is appointed, are recognized…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wood v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  2. Cassidy v. SousterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  3. Evans v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API