Redbarn Chemicals, Inc. v. Bradshaw
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
George Rose Smith, Justice,
This action was brought by Redbarn Chemicals, Inc., to recover judgment upon an $11,479.91 open account for agricultural chemicals and fertilizers sold by Redbarn to the defendants, F. K. Bradshaw, Sr., and his son. The trial court, sitting-without a jury, sustained the defendants! contention that the plaintiff’s claim was void for usury. For reversal Red-barn argues on direct appeal that the Bradshaws failed to prove that the debt was usurious.
We find the proof sufficient to support the judgment. The account extended over a period of many years. It was Redbarn’s…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cox v. Darragh CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
- Brooks v. BurgessSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. CatalaniSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
- Holland v. C. T. Doan Buick Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
- Fields v. SugarSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Bunn v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Superior Improvement Co. v. Mastic Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- In Re RomineCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- Simpson v. Philco Finance Corp.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1976
- Smith v. Figure World Plus, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.