Legal Opinion

Redbarn Chemicals, Inc. v. Bradshaw

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 28, 1973No. 73-23PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George Rose Smith, Justice,

This action was brought by Redbarn Chemicals, Inc., to recover judgment upon an $11,479.91 open account for agricultural chemicals and fertilizers sold by Redbarn to the defendants, F. K. Bradshaw, Sr., and his son. The trial court, sitting-without a jury, sustained the defendants! contention that the plaintiff’s claim was void for usury. For reversal Red-barn argues on direct appeal that the Bradshaws failed to prove that the debt was usurious.

We find the proof sufficient to support the judgment. The account extended over a period of many years. It was Redbarn’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cox v. Darragh CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  2. Brooks v. BurgessSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  3. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. CatalaniSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  4. Holland v. C. T. Doan Buick Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  5. Fields v. SugarSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Bunn v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  2. Superior Improvement Co. v. Mastic Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  3. In Re RomineCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  4. Simpson v. Philco Finance Corp.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1976
  5. Smith v. Figure World Plus, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API