Legal Opinion

Superior Improvement Co. v. Mastic Corp.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 29, 1980No. 80-117PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Justice.

Appellant, a home improvement business, purchased certain materials from appellee, a home siding wholesaler. As the open account grew, appellee Mastic added service charges on the overdue amounts. Appellee filed this suit to recover the balance, $37,581.80, which includ-' ed previously billed service charges totaling $1,382.08. The lower court, sitting as a jury, found appellee was entitled to recover the full amount sought. For reversal appellant contends the trial court erred in finding the charges were not usurious and, further, in finding appellant had failed to prove…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Winkle v. Grand National BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  2. Taylor v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  3. Bunn v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  4. Redbarn Chemicals, Inc. v. BradshawSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  5. Cagle v. Boyle Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. McElroy v. GrishamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  2. Schueck v. BurrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  3. Poff v. PeedinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
  4. George v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  5. Jernigan v. CashSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API