Hipolito v. State Bar
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT.
We examine the recommendation of the Review Department of the State Bar Court (hereafter the department) that petitioner Juan Hipolito be suspended from the practice of law in California for five years, that execution of the suspension be stayed and that he be placed on probation for five years on specified conditions including actual suspension for two years. Because the department erred in rejecting significant mitigating factors found by the hearing panel (hereafter the panel), we conclude the department’s recommended discipline is excessive and choose to modify it. As…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bradpiece v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Chefsky v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Alberton v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Lawhorn v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Palomo v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Howard v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- McKnight v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Coombs v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Snyder v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Stevens v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.