Legal Opinion
Interocean Ships, Inc. v. Samoa Gases
High Court of American Samoa
Decided October 25, 1999No. CA No. 123-85Published
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER REINSTATING JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFF-’S REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL POST-JUDGMENT INTEREST .
The present issue of additional post-judgment interest is the latest in' a long line of skirmishes in the battle of this protracted litigation that arose out of an explosion in 1983 on board the M/V Ocean Pearl, & vessel owned by plaintiff Interocean Ships, Inc. (“Interocean”).
The post-judgment interest saga began when this court rendered a judgment for Interocean on May 2, 1994, specifying post-judgment interest at a rate of 6% per annum. 26 A.S.R.2d 28, 44 (Trial Div. 1994). On June 21, 1995,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- James Turner, and Cross-Appellee v. Japan Lines, Ltd., and Philippine President Lines Inc., Manila, and Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Stockton Theatres, Inc. v. PalermoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Ashland Oil, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. Phillips Petroleum Company, Cross-Appellant, and United States of America, Intervenor-Appellee, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
- Bailey-Allen Co., Inc. v. KurzetCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994
- Mark Landsberg v. Scrabble Crossword Game Players, Inc., Selchow & Richter Company, and Crown Publishers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.