Legal Opinion
Errico v. Southland Corp.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 14, 1993No. C3-93-980PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HAROLD W. SCHULTZ, Acting Judge.
Appellant Juanita Donna Errico (Errieo) brought this negligence action against respondents Southland Corporation and several of its employees (Southland). Her complaint alleged that Southland and its employees had a duty to provide for her safety and security, and that Southland had a duty to properly supervise and train its employees in the protection of its patrons.
Errico appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Southland. We affirm.
FACTS
Sometime after midnight on June 21,1989, Errico and a friend drove into the parking lot of a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sauter Ex Rel. Benson v. SauterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Larson v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Erickson v. Curtis Investment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Delgado v. LohmarSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Lundgren v. FultzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Reimer v. City Of CrookstonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- Sulik v. Total Petroleum, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1994
- Funchess v. Cecil Newman Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Robert Reimer v. City of CrookstonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- United Products Corp. v. Atlas Auto PartsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.