Legal Opinion

Fancher v. Rumsey

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 29, 1935PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This case is before us on writ of error to a judgment in favor of defendants on demurrer sustained to amended declaration.

The controlling question before us for determination is whether or not the declaration sets up a sufficient state of facts to show that the several defendants were joint adventurers in the purchase for resale of a certain lot of real estate and by reason of such relation were jointly liable for the purchase price, although the same was evidenced by promissory notes executed by only one of such joint adventurers.

The facts are not before us and, therefore, we are not called…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Livingston v. MaleverSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  2. Drew v. HobbsSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  3. Falk v. SalarioSupreme Court of Florida · 1933

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Donahue v. DavisSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  2. Dee v. Southern Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1941
  3. Bedell v. WilsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  4. Ivey v. Southern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1937
  5. Malkus v. GainesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API