Madden v. Midland Funding, LLC
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
STRAUB, Circuit Judge:
This putative class action alleges violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”) and New York’s usury law. The proposed class representative, Saliha Madden, alleges that the defendants violated the FDCPA by charging and attempting to collect interest at a rate higher than that permitted under the law of her home state, which is New York. The defendants contend that Madden’s claims fail as a matter of law for two reasons: (1) state-law usury claims and FDCPA claims predicated on state-law violations against a national bank’s assignees, such as the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Watters v. Wachovia Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Beneficial National Bank v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Wachovia Bank, National Ass'n v. SchmidtSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Barnett Bank of Marion County, N. A. v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Galper v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Madden v. Midland Funding, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Noffsinger v. SSC Niantic Operating Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2017
- Cole v. Stephen Einstein & Assocs., P.C.District Court, W.D. New York · 2019
- Mounts v. Midland Funding LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2017
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.