Legal Opinion

Hubbard v. Mutual Acc. Ass'n

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania

Decided June 25, 1897PublishedCited by 8 opinions

On Motion for New Trial.

1Opinion of the Court

BUTLER, District Judge.

The only material question raised by the rule for new trial is — -did the court misconstrue the policy? When the policy was first presented for consideration the inclination of my mind was with the plaintiff. It seemed at first blush that a different construction might, and probably would, render a majority of such policies valueless, inasmuch as a large proportion of the insured are, probably, affected with some disease, which in case of accident might contribute to the fatal consequences which ensue; and that the language might receive a construction which would…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. National Masonic Acc. Ass'n of Des Moines v. ShryockCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
  2. Commercial Travelers' Mut. Acc. Ass'n v. FultonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1897
  3. Whitehouse v. Travelers' Ins. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Hampshire · 1877

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. MorrowCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1914
  3. Worley v. International Travelers Assur. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  4. Abbott v. Travelers InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Goodes v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of AmericaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API