Hubbard v. Mutual Acc. Ass'n
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania
On Motion for New Trial.
1Opinion of the Court
BUTLER, District Judge.
The only material question raised by the rule for new trial is — -did the court misconstrue the policy? When the policy was first presented for consideration the inclination of my mind was with the plaintiff. It seemed at first blush that a different construction might, and probably would, render a majority of such policies valueless, inasmuch as a large proportion of the insured are, probably, affected with some disease, which in case of accident might contribute to the fatal consequences which ensue; and that the language might receive a construction which would…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- National Masonic Acc. Ass'n of Des Moines v. ShryockCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
- Commercial Travelers' Mut. Acc. Ass'n v. FultonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1897
- Whitehouse v. Travelers' Ins. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Hampshire · 1877
3Cited by8 opinions
- First Nat. Bank v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. MorrowCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1914
- Worley v. International Travelers Assur. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Abbott v. Travelers InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- Goodes v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of AmericaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.