Legal Opinion
Society for Savings v. Stramaglia
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 10, 1991No. 8591PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
This appeal involves a dispute between two defendants in a mortgage foreclosure action. The foreclosing plaintiff (bank) did not participate in the appeal.1 The defendant Carmine S. Stramaglia claims that the trial court abused its discretion in denying his *689motion to open the judgment of foreclosure. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts are relevant. The bank instituted this action to foreclose a mortgage on real estate owned jointly by Carmine S. Stramaglia and Patricia R. Stramaglia. Patricia Stramaglia is not a party to this appeal. The defendant Thomas Ackerson…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Connecticut National Bank v. N. E. Owen II, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- Melillo v. SpiroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
3Cited by4 opinions
- Connecticut National Bank v. ZuckermanConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Society for Savings v. StramagliaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Ducci Electrical Contractors, Inc. v. Department of TransportationConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Society for Savings v. StramagliaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991