Wallin v. SCOTTSDALE PLUMBING COMPANY, INC.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JACOBSON, Judge.
This appeal raises the issues of the sufficiency of the evidence to support a finding that a conveyance was fraudulent under A.R.S. § 44 — 1007, and the applicability of the statute of limitations to a fraudulent conveyance in a quiet title action.
These issues arose out of an action commenced by appellee, Scottsdale Plumbing Company (Scottsdale) against appellants Sue and Walter Wallin (Wallin) seeking to quiet title to 40 acres of land located near Tonapah, Arizona. The Wallins answered, setting up as an affirmative defense a deed to the property obtained from her…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Sharpe v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- In Re Estate of McCauleyArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Torosian v. PaulosArizona Supreme Court · 1957
- Continental National Bank v. EvansArizona Supreme Court · 1971
- Davidsen v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1938
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Adams v. AdamsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
- Moore v. BrowningCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- Backman v. BackmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980