Legal Opinion

Davidsen v. Salt Lake City

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1938No. 5929PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOYT, District Judge.

In this case plaintiff asks that a deed from plaintiff to defendant city be set aside and that title to the land described in the deed be quieted in plaintiff. The complaint also contains a prayer for general relief. Plaintiff asserts that the deed was obtained by fraud. The defendant city denies this, and further alleges that the suit is barred by the provisions of subdivision 4 of Section 6468, Compiled Laws 1917, which provides that an action for relief on the ground of fraud or mistake shall be brought within three years, and that the cause of action in such case…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CrowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. New v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  3. Warner v. ColemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Brazil v. SilvaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Morgan v. MorganWashington Supreme Court · 1894

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In Re Hoopiiaina TrustUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Calder v. Third Judicial District CourtUtah Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Primus v. ClarkNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Bangerter v. PettyUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Lott v. SaultersMississippi Supreme Court · 2014

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API