Legal Opinion

J. H. Lane & Co. v. Maple Cotton Mill

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided February 2, 1916No. Nos. 1362-1364PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeals from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of South Carolina, at Charleston; Henry A. Middleton Smith, Judge. On rehearing.

1Opinion of the Court

WOODS, Circuit Judge.

In the opinion heretofore filed in this cause a full statement was made of the legal issues and the facts out of which they arose. It is sufficient to say here that the appeal is from a decree of the District Court refusing to set aside, at the in*422stance of J. H. Lane & Co. and John M. Tallman, minority stockholders, sales of 'the Dillon Cotton Mills, Maple Cotton Mill, and the Hamer Cotton Mills, made in pursuance of resolutions of the stockholders of the several corporations.

This court affirmed the decree holding that the District Judge had decided correctly all the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Michoud v. GirodSupreme Court of the United States · 1846
  2. Magruder v. DrurySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. United States v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. Pine River Logging Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  5. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1896

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Dickey v. VolkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  3. Williams v. YocumWyoming Supreme Court · 1928
  4. In Re Security Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
  5. First Trust Co. of Lincoln v. RickettsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API