Legal Opinion

Carrere v. Dun

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided September 15, 1896PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an affirmance by the City Court, General Term, of a judgment in favor of plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.

The action is by the plaintiff, as assignee of William Carrere, to recover for services alleged to have been rendered by him in going over certain books of the defendant and making up a statement therefrom. The defense relied upon was no employment and the absence of any agreement on the part of the defendant to pay for the services rendered.

These are substantially the facts: William Carrere was an accountant employed by R. G. Dun & Co., of which firm the defendant was senior member. The defendant wanted some of his individual books gone over, and requested Mr. Greene, another of the firm’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Davis v. . SpencerNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  2. Dinan v. . ConeysNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Howard v. NortonNew York Supreme Court · 1873
  4. People v. ParishNew York Supreme Court · 1847
  5. Marvin v. InglisNew York Court of Appeals · 1869

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MarableIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Gutweiler v. LundquistMissouri Court of Appeals · 1919
  3. Bloodgood v. WuestAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  4. Bloodgood v. WuestAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  5. Carrere v. DubAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1899

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API