Legal Opinion

Bloodgood v. Wuest

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1902PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, George W. Bloodgood, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendant, entered in the office, of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 8th day of April, 1901, upon the dismissal of the complaint by direction of the court after a trial at the Kings County Trial Term, and also from an order entered* in said clerk’s office on the 17th day of April, 1901, denying the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.

1Opinion of the Court

Jenks, J.:

The plaintiff testified that on January 1, 1898, he became an assistant equity clerk in the public office of the defendant, who was county clerk of Kings county ; that a few weeks thereafter he said *357to the defendant that the work was accumulating; that he was working on it overtime, whereupon the defendant said: “ Well,, keep it up; * * * I will pay you, keep the work up, I will! pay you— will pay you for it;” that this was substantially repeated-, at several subsequent conversations. During the time in question^ the plaintiff received a regular monthly salary. His bill for the?…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Carrere v. DunAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1896
  2. Kleb v. WallachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Temple v. BrooksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
  2. Montreuil v. Board of EstimateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API