Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Marable
Indiana Supreme Court
From Clark Circuit Court; James W. Fortune, Judge. Action by' Nathaniel Marable against the Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railway Company. Prom a judgment for the plaintiff, the defendant appeals. (Transferred from the Appellate Court under <$1399 Burns 1914, Acts 1901 p. 565, §15.)
1Opinion of the CourtLairy, C. J.
Appellee recovered a judgment in the court below based on a claim for additional compensation for services rendered by him as rear brakeman during a period of time in which he was regularly employed by appellant at a fixed compensation as porter to one of its trains running between Louisville, Kentucky, and Logansport, Indiana.
The questions presented on appeal arise on exceptions to the rulings of the court on appellant’s demurrer to the complaint, and on áppellant’s motion for judgment on the answers to interrogatories notwithstanding the general verdict.
1. *2812. *280Under some circumstances a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Illinois Central Railroad v. CheekIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
- Ross v. . HardinNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Carrere v. DunAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1896
- Mathison v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- Town of Monticello v. CondoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Crooke v. LugarIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Rose Acre Farms, Inc. v. ConeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- Robinette v. Hubbard Coal Mining Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1921
- McGuire v. Interurban Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1924
- Henderson v. Brown Electrical Supply Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.