Palmer v. Los Angeles, Ocean Park & Santa Monica Railway Co.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
The plaintiff commenced an action against the defendants, the defendants appeared and interposed demurrers, the demurrers were sustained; the plaintiff elected not to amend, and judgment was thereafter entered in favor of the defendants for their costs. Prom that judgment the plaintiff has appealed.
The complaint alleged the incorporation of the corporations ; that on the twenty-seventh day of March, 1903, the plaintiff was the owner of a tract of land near Santa Monica, in the county of Los Angeles, and that the tract was bounded on the south by the Compton and Santa Monica road; that the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- City of Tyler v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1906
- Behlow v. Southern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Union Water Co. v. Murphy's Flat Fluming Co.California Supreme Court · 1863
- Savings Bank of San Diego v. BarrettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- City of Manhattan Beach v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Lemon v. Los Angeles Terminal Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
- Midstate Oil Co. v. Ocean Shore Railroad Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
- Rio Vista Gas Assn. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.