Legal Opinion
Roepsch v. Bentsen
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided March 21, 1994No. 91-C-1232PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
RANDA, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on pro se plaintiff Edward J. Roepsch’s (“plaintiff’) motions to remove attorney William P. Lehman from representation of the Secretary of the Treasury (interchangeably, “defendant” or “Secretary”) and for an order requiring the United States Attorney to demonstrate its authority to proceed on behalf of the Secretary. In addition, the defendant has moved for partial dismissal or, alternatively, for judgment on the pleadings. For the reasons set forth below, plaintiffs motions are denied and defendant’s motions are…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Lehman v. NakshianSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Library of Congress v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Adams v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Hill v. RunyonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
- Gilbert v. Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1997
- Jones v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Fausto v. RenoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.