Legal Opinion
Eliason v. Funk
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided February 5, 1964No. [No. 139, September Term, 1963.]PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHenderson, J.
This appeal is from a judgment for costs entered after the court granted a motion to dismiss an action against John B. Funk and Russell S. Davis. These defendants were sued, with three others, in a narr alleging conspiracy to cause the appellant’s discharge from the Classified Service. The court sustained a demurrer filed by the other three, with leave to amend, but that ruling is not before us.
The motion purported to be based upon Rule 323 b, which provides:
“b. Motion Mandatory —■ Charitable and Governmental Immunity.
The defense of total or partial charitable or governmental immunity shall…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Barr v. MatteoSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Wheeldin v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Yaselli v. GoffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Edward Nero v. Marilyn MosbyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
- Baltimore Police Department v. CherkesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Brewer v. MeleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
- Bradshaw v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Robinson v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.