Legal Opinion

A. Steinhardt & Bro. v. United States

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided February 5, 1903No. 3,215PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHEELER, District Judge.

Paragraph 339 of the tariff act of July 24, 1897 (30 Stat. 181 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1662]), places a duty of 60 per cent, ad valorem on “embroideries and all trimmings, including braids, edgings, insertings, flouncings, galloons, gorings, *443and bands,” “composed wholly or in chief value of cotton flax or other vegetable fiber,” not otherwise provided for, and paragraph 320 (30 Stat. 179 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1661]) for one of 45 per cent, on “bandings, beltings, bindings, bonecasings, cords, garters, lining for bicycle tires, ribbons, suspenders and braces,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hiller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1901

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. MacyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  2. Morimura Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  3. Baruch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1909
  4. United States v. HagueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API