Legal Opinion

Morimura Bros. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 22, 1916No. 1561PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal’ from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 37624.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, Presiding Judge

The merchandise in this case consists of lamp shades, which were assessed for duty at the rate of 60 per cent under the provisions of paragraph 358 of the act of 1913, and are claimed to be dutiable at the rate of 45 per cent ad valorem as manufactures of silk under paragraph 318 of the same act. The board overruled the protest, and held the lamp shades to be in part of braid and dutiable under the provisions of paragraph 358 providing for “ braids, loom woven and ornamented in the process of weaving, or made by hand, or on any braid machine, knitting machine, or lace machine, and not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hartranft v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. United States v. Snow's United States Sample Express Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  3. A. Steinhardt & Bro. v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1903

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. MacyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  2. Gimbel Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API