Legal Opinion

Bruce v. City of Hillsboro

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 14, 1999No. LUBA No. 96-153; CA A103234PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, C. J.

Petitioner seeks review of LUBA’s order awarding respondent City of Hillsboro costs and attorney fees of approximately $5,400, pursuant to ORS 197.830(14)(b).1 We affirm.

Petitioner appealed to LUBA from four separate ordinances adopted by the city that were related to the zoning of an area designated as a Light Rail Station Community Planning Area. Two of the ordinances that petitioner challenged were general ordinances affecting the entire planning area and two of the ordinances applied specifically to petitioner’s property. Petitioner filed a single notice of appeal purporting to challenge…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Don't Waste Oregon Committee v. Energy Facility Siting CouncilOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Columbia River Television v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. O'ROURKE v. Union CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  3. Jacobus v. Klamath CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API