Columbia River Television v. Multnomah County
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCarson, J.
Petitioner asks us to reverse the Court of Appeals’ decision concluding that a rule of the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA), rather than a local government’s ordinance, determines when a local government’s decision is “final” for the purposes of appeal. We reverse and remand to LUBA for decision on the merits.
The resolution of this case lies in the interrelationship and potential conflict of a statute, an agency rule and a county ordinance:
Statute: The legislature has provided in ORS 197.830(7), in relevant part, as follows:
“A notice of intent to appeal a land use decision shall be filed not…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Far West Landscaping, Inc. v. Pacific Cascade Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Benton County v. Friends of Benton CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Jefferson Landfill Committee v. Marion CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Columbia River Television v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. AinsworthOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Bruce v. City of HillsboroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- State ex rel. Willamette Community Health Solutions v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Bigej Enterprises v. Tillamook CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Kalmiopsis Audubon Society v. Curry CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.