Bernal v. The Boeing Company
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 9 AT SEATTLE 10 11 PAUL BERNAL, CASE NO. 2:22-cv-00533-TL 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ON MOTION FOR v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT 13 THE BOEING COMPANY, 14 Defendant. 15 16 17 This is an action for damages under the Washington Law Against Discrimination 18 (“WLAD”), RCW 49.60 et seq., for alleged retaliation. This matter is before the Court on 19 Defendant the Boeing Company’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 30). Having 20 considered Plaintiff Paul Bernal’s response (Dkt. No. 39), Defendant’s reply (Dkt. No. 40), and 21 the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.