Legal Opinion
Haag v. Beard Sand & Gravel Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 18, 1963PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, J.
The defendants have appealed from a judgment rendered on a verdict for the plaintiff. Their sole assignment of error is the denial of their motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. That motion is predicated on the action of the trial court in denying their motion for a directed verdict. Practice Book § 234. The latter motion was denied because it was not timely made.
The parties had concluded their evidence and had rested. The plaintiff’s opening argument to the jury had been in progress for about forty-five minutes when the noon recess was taken. When court resumed, the defendants…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Robinson v. Southern New England Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Goldberger v. David Roberts Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Dibiase v. GarnseySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Jacobs v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
3Cited by10 opinions
- Discover Leasing, Inc. v. MurphyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Matyas v. MinckConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Farlow v. Andrews CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Kline v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
- MacChietto v. KeggiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.