Tallman v. State, Department of Public Works
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RABINO WITZ, Chief Justice.
The issues in this appeal arise out of condemnation proceedings in which the State of Alaska, pursuant to the state’s power of eminent domain, acquired real property belonging to appellants James K. Tallman and Alice P. Tallman.
Prior to the proceedings, the Tallmans were the owners of record of Lots 4 and 5, Block 30, Original Townsite, city of Anchorage. The two parcels lay directly adjacent to the state courthouse property in Anchorage. When the state decided to expand its court facilities, the Tallman contiguous lots were chosen for the expansion project.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Bridges v. Alaska Housing AuthorityAlaska Supreme Court · 1959
- Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. GarlandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1965
- Irwin v. Radio Corporation of AmericaAlaska Supreme Court · 1967
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wallace v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1997
- Brigman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2003