Legal Opinion

Irwin v. Radio Corporation of America

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1967No. 744PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIMOND, Justice.

After a -civil trial jury of twelve with one alternate juror had been impaneled and sworn, appellant moved to dismiss the jury and to have another impaneled on the ground that the impaneling of the jury did not conform to the requirements of statute. The motion was denied by the court below. Appellant claims on this appeal that the denial of such motion was reversible error.

The selection of jurors is regulated by statute. Based on a .voting list prepared by the secretary of state from the preceding general election, the clerk of the superior court for each judicial district…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hess v. Mullaney, Commissioner of TaxationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
  2. Application of FinkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
  3. In re FinkDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1953
  4. Cramer v. Kincaid & King Const. Co.District Court, D. Alaska · 1951

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kelly v. ZamarelloAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Grimes v. HaslettAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  3. United Bonding Insurance Company v. CastleAlaska Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Tallman v. State, Department of Public WorksAlaska Supreme Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API