Creo Products, Inc. v. Presstek, Inc., Defendant-Cross
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge BRYSON. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge CLEVENGER.
BRYSON, Circuit Judge.
Creo Products, Inc., appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware holding that two patents belonging to Presstek, Inc., are not invalid. Presstek cross-appeals from the district court’s judgment that Creo’s on-press imaging system does not infringe either of Presstek’s patents. We affirm.
I
Although technology has made printing faster, cheaper, and more accurate, the underlying concept of the printing press has remained the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wms Gaming Inc. v. International Game TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Atmel Corporation v. Information Storage Devices, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Rodime Plc v. Seagate Technology, Inc., Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- William A. Budde v. Harley-Davidson, Inc. And Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Defendants-Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc., Guidant Sales Corporation, and Eli Lilly and Company v. St. Jude Medical, Inc., Pacesetter, Inc., and Ventritex, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Dealertrack, Inc. v. HuberCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Xerox Corp. v. Google, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2010
- Predicate Logic, Inc. v. Distributive Software, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Linear Technology Corp. v. Impala Linear Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Elcommerce.com, Inc. v. SAP AG & SAP America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.