City of Eureka v. Gates
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated, in the opinion of the court.' Henry L. Ford, L. M. Burnell, and E. M. Frost, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
action is to recover possession of a certain part of Tenth Street, between I and J streets, in the city of Eureka, and a certain part of an alley leading to said part of Tenth Street. Defendant Mrs. Gates answered by specific denials of the allegations of the complaint, pleaded adverse possession, and also the statute of limitations. By way of cross-complaint she seeks to correct a description given in a •certain deed to one Close, April 7, 1881, by which she described the land conveyed as bounded by Tenth Street and the alley referred to in the complaint, and also to correct a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- City of Eureka v. ArmstrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Ward v. YorbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bradbury v. HigginsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- City of Imperial Beach v. AlgertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- La Mancha Development Corp. v. SheegogCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Pierce v. FreitasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Keene v. Ætna Life Ins.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.