Legal Opinion

Green v. St. Vincent's Medical Center

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided September 15, 2008No. Civil No. 3:06-CV-01916 (CFD)PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL

THOMAS P. SMITH, United States Magistrate Judge.

Pending before the court is defendant’s motion to compel discovery. (Dkt. # 18). For the reasons set forth below, defendant’s motion to compel is GRANTED. The defendant’s request for an award of reasonable *126expenses incurred in making this motion, pursuant to Rule 37(a)(5)(A) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is DENIED, without prejudice to its renewal on conclusion of this case.

I. Background

This action involves allegations of violations of the Connecticut Fair Employment Practices Act, Conn. Gen.Stat.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Jaffee v. RedmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Harold D. Blankenship, an Individual v. The Hearst Corporation, a Corporation, William H. Myers, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  4. Sims v. BlotCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  5. Berry v. LoiseauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. Connecticut Community Technical CollegesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
  2. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Nichols Gas & Oil, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2009
  3. Cappetta v. GC Services Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2009
  4. Allen v. O'NeillDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021
  5. Arnold v. Independent Health CorpDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2019

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API