Legal Opinion
Cablevision Systems Corp. v. Federal Communications Commission
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 22, 2009No. Docket 07-5553-agPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN M. WALKER, JR., Circuit Judge:
The must-carry provisions of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Com petition Act (“1992 Cable Act” or “Cable Act”) require cable operators to transmit, over their cable systems, the signals of certain broadcast stations operating in the same market. The statute also gives the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC” or “the Commission”) authority to modify a given broadcast station’s market, thus potentially changing the universe of cable operators required to carry that station. In this case, Cablevision, a cable systems operator, petitions for…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Time Warner Cable Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Caplash v. JohnsonDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2017
- International Action Center v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Comcast of Maine/New Hampshire v. MillsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.