Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KENNETH M. KARAS, District Judge:
In the context of water regulation, federal law provides that “the discharge of any pollutant by any person shall be unlawful.” 33 U.S.C. § 1311(a). And, as relevant here, it defines a “discharge of a pollutant” to mean “any addition of any pollutant to navigable waters from any point source.” Id. § 1362(12). The Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) interprets these provisions not to apply to a “water transfer,” which it has defined, in a regulation, to mean “an activity that conveys or connects waters of the United States without…
2Cases cited90 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
- Huai Zhou Chen v. Board of Immigration AppealsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. EPA (Catskill III)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
- Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
- West McDonald Lake Ass'n v. Minnesota Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017