Arnold v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Chief Judge.
The defendant was convicted of robbery by sudden snatching. Code Ann. § 26-1901. Held:
1. The admission of the testimony of a police officer as to his conversation with the victim of the robbery may have been error as the record fails to clearly show that it was admissible under Code § 38-302 to explain the officer’s conduct, or as a part of the res gestae under Code § 38-305. However, the error was harmless as the victim testified without objection to the same facts that were contained in her statement to this police officer and made a positive identification of defendant.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Clenney v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
- Young v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
- Sheffield v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Watkins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
- Pitts v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Durden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Womack v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Arnold v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Leach v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Leach v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976