Legal Opinion

Arnold v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 4, 1974No. 49772PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Chief Judge.

The defendant was convicted of robbery by sudden snatching. Code Ann. § 26-1901. Held:

1. The admission of the testimony of a police officer as to his conversation with the victim of the robbery may have been error as the record fails to clearly show that it was admissible under Code § 38-302 to explain the officer’s conduct, or as a part of the res gestae under Code § 38-305. However, the error was harmless as the victim testified without objection to the same facts that were contained in her statement to this police officer and made a positive identification of defendant.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Clenney v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
  2. Young v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
  3. Sheffield v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  4. Watkins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
  5. Pitts v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Durden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  2. Womack v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  3. Arnold v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  4. Leach v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  5. Leach v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API