Legal Opinion

Leach v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 24, 1976No. 51821Published

1Opinion

On Motion for Rehearing.

The movant (appellant) contends the third division of the opinion is erroneous. The cases cited by movant, Fowler v. State, 132 Ga. App. 812 (209 SE2d 255) and Arnold v. State, 133 Ga. App. 451 (211 SE2d 404), point out that, under the prior bifurcated jury procedure, records of conviction were not admissible absent a showing that the accused was represented by counsel.

Here no records of conviction were offered or admitted into evidence. The trial judge, apparently referring to an F. B. I. "rap sheet,” asked the accused various questions about his previous…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clark v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  2. Mitchell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  3. Fowler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  4. Arnold v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API