Durden v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Sognier, Judge.
1. Cummings and Durden were convicted of robbery by sudden snatching and appeal on the general grounds. Cummings also claims error in denial of his motion for a directed verdict of acquittal based on insufficiency of the evidence. We have examined the entire transcript .and find the evidence more than sufficient to sustain the verdict and to meet the standards for review set forth in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560). Thus, it was not error to deny Cummings’ motion for a directed verdict of acquittal. Gregg v. State, 233 Ga. 117, 123 (3) (210 SE2d…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Gregg v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
- Arnold v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
3Cited by3 opinions
- Byrd v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
- Whitehead v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Whitehead v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985