Federal Power Commission v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burton
The most significant issue raised by this case is whether the Federal Water Power Act of 19201 has abolished pri*241vate proprietary rights, existing under state law, to use waters of a navigable stream for power purposes. We agree with the Court of Appeals that it has not. We agree also that in computing a federal licensee’s amortization reserve, required by § 10 (d) of that Act, as amended,2 the Federal Power Commission was not justified in disallowing the expenses paid or incurred by the licensee in this ease for the use of such rights.
March 2, 1921, Niagara Falls Power Company, a New York…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- United States v. Appalachian Electric Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. Chandler-Dunbar Water Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- United States v. CressSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- First Iowa Hydro-Electric Cooperative v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. Gerlach Live Stock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by107 opinions
- United States v. Virginia Electric & Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Braniff Airways, Inc. v. Nebraska State Board of Equalization & AssessmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. RandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. Twin City Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- California v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.