Legal Opinion

State v. Jackson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 2012No. 2011-1925PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.

I. Introduction

{¶ 1} The question before the court is whether an indictment charging a defendant with trafficking in drugs under R.C. 2925.03 must name the specific drug involved in the offense or whether identifying the schedule in which a drug appears is sufficient. We hold that the indictment is sufficient if it names the schedule in which the drug appears. Therefore, we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.

II. Procedural History

{¶ 2} On December 10, 2008, a Lorain County grand jury issued an indictment charging appellee, Alfred Jackson, with five criminal counts, including two…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. State v. HeadleyOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. SellardsOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. MurphyOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. FoustOhio Supreme Court · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. MielkeOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. State v. KremerOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. State v. LackeyOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. State v. KolvekOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. State v. SewellOhio Court of Appeals · 2018

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API