Legal Opinion

Slorby v. Slorby

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 2009No. 20080105PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Tom P. Slorby appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to abate spousal support. We reverse, concluding the district court erred in denying Tom Slorby’s motion to abate spousal support, and we remand for a calculation consistent with this opinion.

I

[¶ 2] Tom Slorby and Maureen S. Slor-by were divorced in April 1999. The original divorce judgment did not require either party to pay spousal support. In 2001, the judgment was amended by stipulation. The amended judgment required Tom Slorby to pay $1,000 a month in spousal support starting in September 2001,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. QuistNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Silbernagel v. SilbernagelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Botner v. BotnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Kienzle v. SelenskyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Glasser v. GlasserNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Davidson v. State Ex Rel. North Dakota State Board of Higher EducationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Pember v. ShapiroNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Holbach v. HolbachNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Black Stone Minerals Co., L.P. v. BrokawNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Matter of G.R.H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API