Legal Opinion

Ross v. Springfield School District No. 19

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 21, 1984No. FD 80-1; CA A29074PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*113YOUNG, J.

Petitioner is a permanent teacher who was employed by respondent School District for 19 years, most recently as an elementary school librarian. In 1980, respondent dismissed him from his position for inefficiency, gross unfitness and immorality. The Fair Dismissal Appeals Board found the charge of inefficiency unfounded but upheld the dismissal based on gross unfitness and immorality. We affirmed. Ross v. Springfield School Dist. No. 19, 56 Or App 197, 641 P2d 600 (1982). The Supreme Court, on review, held that FDAB was bound by a decision of the Teacher Standards and Practices…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. McPherson v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Ross v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Ross v. Springfield School District No. 19Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ross v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Czerniak v. City of MilwaukeeDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1987
  3. State v. LawsonHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Ross v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Ross v. Springfield School District No. 19Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API