Legal Opinion

Ross v. Springfield School District No. 19

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1986No. FDAB 80-1; CA A29074; SC S31480Published

1Opinion of the Court

716 P.2d 724 (1986)

300 Or. 507

Frank W. ROSS, Petitioner On Review,

v.

SPRINGFIELD SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 19, Respondent On Review.

FDAB 80-1; CA A29074; SC S31480.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Argued and Submitted April 3, 1985.

Reassigned January 31, 1986.

Decided February 11, 1986.

Robert D. Durham, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner on review. With him on the petition was Kulongoski, Durham, Drummonds & Columbo, Portland.

John C. Volmert, Springfield, argued the cause for respondent on review. With him on the response was Wurtz, Logan & Logan, Springfield.

James M. Campbell, Eugene, filed a…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. McPherson v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Megdal v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. City of Roseburg v. Roseburg City Firefighters, Local No. 1489Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Trebesch v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API