Legal Opinion

Foster v. Back Bay Spas, Inc.

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided September 15, 1997No. 967060Published

1Opinion of the CourtBurnes, J.

This motion for summary judgment arises out of plaintiff James Foster’s action to require the defendant, Back Bay Spas, Inc., dba Healthworks Fitness Center, to allow him to join the health club. The club does not admit men. Foster argues that this policy violates G.L.c. 272, §§92A and 98 (“public accommodations statute”). For the reasons set forth below, the plaintiffs motion is ALLOWED.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff James Foster (“Foster”) is a male resident of 130 Dartmouth Street in Boston. Defendant Back Bay Spas, Inc. d/b/a Healthworks Fitness Center (“Healthworks”) owns and operates a health club…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pederson v. Time, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  2. Community National Bank v. DawesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  3. Cassesso v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  4. Schlesinger v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  5. Mulgrew v. City of TauntonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API