Legal Opinion

Schlesinger v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 11, 1991PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, J.

The plaintiff, Alan J. Schlesinger, filed a complaint in the Superior Court seeking to enjoin representatives of the defendant, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., from calling him on the telephone at his law office to solicit the sale of securities. After discovery was completed, the defendant moved for summary judgment pursuant to Mass. R. Civ. P. 56 (b), 365 Mass. 824 (1974). A judge of the Superior Court granted summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff, and entered an order permanently enjoining the defendant from making telephone calls to the plaintiff’s office. The defendant…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Bratt v. International Business MacHines Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  2. Bally v. Northeastern UniversityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  3. Nader v. General Motors Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Sofka v. ThalSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  5. Jones v. TaibbiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Ayash v. Dana-Farber Cancer InstituteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  2. Nelson v. Salem State CollegeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  3. Polay v. McMahonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  4. Ellis v. Safety InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
  5. Dasey v. Massachusetts DepartCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API