State v. Hlady
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLee, J.
Defendant appeals his conviction of fraudulent use of a credit card. After an adverse ruling on defendant’s motion to suppress, the case was tried to the court on stipulated facts. Defendant assigns as error the admission of evidence obtained from a warrantless search of his wallet and the denial of a motion to suppress statements he made to the arresting officers prior to recitation of Miranda warnings.
Two police officers responded to a burglary alarm at a camera shop. Upon arrival, the officers were informed that they were summoned because the defendant was attempting to purchase camera…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Michigan v. DeFillippoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Scott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Arkansas v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. SmithCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1982
- State v. KurtzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- State v. PattonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- State v. MoellerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- State v. DoreyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.