Legal Opinion

LeCuyer v. Weidenbach

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided April 29, 1985No. 84 C 6729PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

GETZENDANNER, District Judge:

This action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for deprivation of civil rights is currently before the court on the motion of defendants Steven L. Weidenbach and Robert B. Ben-stein to dismiss for failure to state a claim. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). For the reasons stated below, the motion is granted.

For purposes of the present motion, the court accepts the well-pleaded allegations of plaintiff’s complaint as true. Plaintiff Kenneth LeCuyer is an Illinois citizen. Defendants Steven L. Weidenbach and Robert B. Benstein are conservation officers employed…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Ingraham v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. United States v. ClassicSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kolpak v. BellDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
  2. Stanulonis v. MarzecDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1986
  3. Bailey v. State of Ill.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
  4. Akbaar-El v. ShelleyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API